![]() I removed the first person, and added one reference - I will add one more to the Pāli part but I will need a day or two. Moreover, all your references lack page numbers. Vardhanajñāna ( talk) 17:12, 14 June 2018 (UTC) Reply The last two paragraphs you added are still entirely unreferenced, and in one place written in the first person both points need to be addressed, or the paragraphs removed. I would be grateful if you could have a look to let me know whether now the cited sources look sufficient. I have now revised the article once again, including a large number of references. Wikipedia does not use original research, sources need to be cited. Assuming (as others have) that this was the revert in question, it was entirely because none of that material cited a professionally-published academic source.David Biddulph ( talk) 14:01, 14 June 2018 (UTC) Reply According to the History tab for Buddhist poetry the revert was done by user:Z0 who didn't leave a summary but you could ask on their talk page user talk:Z0. Eagleash ( talk) 13:59, 14 June 2018 (UTC) Reply As the IP had made a large addition which was entirely unsourced, the reversion should not have been a surprise. contribs) 13:57, 14 June 2018 (UTC) Reply Probably relates to Buddhist poetry where some recent IP edits were removed and a message left at the IP talk page that they were unconstructive.Preceding unsigned comment added by Vardhanajñāna ( talk The reason why the edit does not appear with my account is that I created an account only after this happened. Several people even read it and offered some suggestions, which I incorporated. Are you sure you saved (published) your edit? RJFJR ( talk) 13:53, 14 June 2018 (UTC) Reply contribs) 13:42, 14 June 2018 (UTC) Reply This is the only entry by your account.I would be grateful if I could receive a clearer explanation of why my edit was removed. This, in fact, could not be further from the truth. In its present state, that is, without my edit, the entry on "Buddhist Poetry" is entirely tilted towards East-Asian poetry, giving the misleading impression that an Indic Buddhist poetic tradition did not exist. I would appreciate some further explanation. All my additions were removed by an editor with the explanation that my edit was "not constructive". I added a detailed section about Buddhist poetry in India, with some emphasis on the Sanskrit tradition. ![]() I recently offered a rather detailed edit on the Wikipedia entry on "Buddhist Poetry". Dk1919 ( talk) 11:16, 14 June 2018 (UTC) Reply Grazie e altrettanto. Looks good? Sam Sailor 11:15, 14 June 2018 (UTC) Reply Absolutely. Dk1919 ( talk) 10:48, 14 June 2018 (UTC) Reply Dk1919 Franking: Trappist the monk already took care of it in Special:Diff/845818208/845820117 with the addition of "width=25%". Can anyone help me out? Thanks in advance. I'd like it to be significantly smaller and moved to the right, just like on the Italian version. The goigs were sung during the religious ceremonies, the processions, the pilgrimages and the votive festivals. In Catalan, where the word took origin, the plural and masculine form is always used even if it is about a single piece, in light of their goal to celebrate the Virgin's Seven Joys. In the so-called Catalan Countries, the goigs are popular compositions of poetry praising the Virgin Mary or the Saints. I've just come up with this, which takes up the entire space! Thing is, in spite of being on Wikipedia for years I'm not familiar with the technical procedure at all. Hi everyone! I've been working on this page I've created yesterday by translating it from Italian, and I wanted to create the small table to the right you can see on the original page.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |